Some partnerships might have had the discussion that if responder holds 5 spades and 4 hearts bid spades then bid hearts, but does this bidding sequence show forcing values 10+ hcp or not? How does responder proceed with 7-9 points and 5-4 or 5-5 in the majors.
This analysis is by Geoff Phipps. (see blog Page: Authors)
here is a sample deal ...
In order to solve this problem it works well to play that the bid of 2♥ is natural and nonforcing Alert then opener can pass with 4 hearts or take a preference to spades with fewer than 4 hearts and at least 2 spades. I would recommend that to create a forcing bid the partnership play that the bid of 2♦ (other minor) over the 2♣ bid is artificial and forcing Alert and that opener bids as naturally as possible.
This treatment allows South to bid 2♥ on the example here as nonforcing and lets opener choose what to do. With a better hand (10+ hcp) South must bid 2♦ as responder after opener repeats 2♣. This is forcing and allows partner to bid naturally. This is not a new concept, but requires partnership discussion.
here is the auction for the sample deal ...
West
|
North
|
East
|
South
|
1 ♣
|
Pass
|
1 ♠
|
|
Pass
|
2 ♣
|
Pass
|
2 ♥1
|
Pass
|
2 ♠
|
All pass
|
1. non forcing
Auction: North deals and with 14 hcp and 6½ losers has a solid opening hand. North opens the bidding with 1♣ with the plans on rebid to bid 2♣. East and West are silent throughout. South with 8 hcp and 7 losers responds 1♠ and North as planned rebids 2♣. The 2♣ limits North's values to an opening hand (12-14 hcp) with nothing extra.
South is in a very awkward position without forcing values and in the auction here, bids 2 ♥ as nonforcing Alert, asking partner (North) to pass or correct to 2♠. South's bid of 2♥ denies tolerance for clubs.
With forcing values of 10+ hcp South would first bid 2♦ as artificial and forcing Alert, asking opener to further define his hand. And like NMF 2♦ would be an asking bid, not a telling bid.
The HHI Bridge blog is dedicated to a better understanding of the game of bridge. There is not just one way to bid or play a hand of bridge, there will be differences of opinion and that is OK ... feel free to make a comment on a post.
1 comment:
Geoff’s expert view is certainly endorsed by others, notably by Steve Robinson in Washington Standard.
Robinson (paraphrasing) writes:
‘After 1C — 1S — 2C, responder bids 2D, nmf. This allows responder
to bid 2H with weak hands that contain both majors.’
Importantly, Robinson goes on to add:
‘After 1D — 1S — 2D, 2H has to be natural and forcing for one round,
AND After 1D — 1S — 2C, 2H is 4th suit, forcing to game.’
Post a Comment